If Your Mind Was OpenSSL… Or, Truth Behind The Conspiracy Theory: MONARCH Mind Control

(Featuring a guest appearance by none other than the Illuminati!)

In the Christian tradition, Easter is a time of rejuvenation and renewal. Indeed, in pre-Christian times, Easter was an important fertility celebration, and the name Easter comes from Ēostre or Ostara… a goddess who contributed the rabbit & egg symbology so many people still use today.

Ostara was, according to Wikipedia, the goddess of dawn and up-springing light. Coincidentally, shining light into previously dark places is an excellent way to bring about rejuvenation and renewal.

Therefore, grab your carbide lamps and hip waders, and let’s go look at some dark places.

The file I’d like to introduce you to today is here. It’s long, so go ahead and click the link right now so it can download as you read: http://web.archive.org/web/20130618163312/http://www.empty-memories.nl/science/greenbaum.pdf

The first thing you’ll notice about it is, unlike most things related to conspiracy topics, how academic the style is. In fact, it was never intended to have anything to do with conspiracies.

The speech of which it is a transcript was given at the Fourth Annual Eastern Regional Conference on Abuse and Multiple Personality, in 1992, at the Radisson Plaza Hotel in Alexandria, VA.

The speaker, too, is remarkable for how deep his credentials go. At the time he gave the speech, D. Corydon Hammond already held a laundry list of awards, degrees, and academic titles.

In fact, he was the current sitting president of the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis at the time he gave the speech. He would later go on to become president of the International Society for Neurofeedback and Research, and as of this writing he has written at least six major books in his field.

Now, since the contents of the speech fall well into the domain of ‘extraordinary claims,’ you might think that after giving it he was ostracized and fell out of favor in the academic field.

Not so.

D. Corydon Hammond is currently a full clinical professor at the University of Utah Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitiation. He is also Co-director of the Sex and Marital Therapy Clinic at that university, and has led a national task force on hypnosis and memory.

Indeed, Hammond is one of the most prominent and respected researchers in the field of hypnosis and memory: he’s written books like the “Handbook of Hypnotic Suggestions and Metaphors,” “Memory, Trauma Treatment, and the Law,” “Hypnotic Induction & Suggestion,” and “Medical & Psychological Hypnosis: How It Benefits Patients.”

Why am I telling you all this? Because, what you are about to read is nearly unthinkable. And, most of the evidence D. Corydon Hammond offers up rests upon his reliability as an investigator.

Therefore, it is crucial for you to understand that his conclusions are the results of patient inquiry by a finely-honed scientific mind, widely respected by his peers. We can safely assume that his observations are reliable. Anything he said was almost certainly backed up by a great deal of evidence, because hard-won reputation was too at risk — considering how far he was “putting himself out there” — to do anything else.

So what exactly is in this speech?

For one thing, the phenomena he describes is evidently very widespread. He references colleagues in Toronto, Seattle, Florida, Cincinnati… all who are seeing patients who are suffering from the same bizarre conditions.

This is not an isolated phenomena.

Second, he had a source “on the inside,” who gave him clear technical details of what was going on. He was able to verify the accuracy of this information with his own patients, and by asking other therapists to try certain things and report the results. He and those therapists did so being careful not to “contaminate” the patients — making sure the patients didn’t simply repeat back what the therapists said.

Third, what we currently know about MKULTRA and other “mind control” subjects must be revised. The reason is this: so far we have been told that the CIA started investigating “mind control” when US soldiers came back brainwashed from Korea. According to Hammond’s source, and independently verified by carefully probing the memories of patients, the “mind control” programs are originally… “Made in Germany.”

In other words, the product of research conducted by the Nazis in WWII, and then brought to the US under the infamous Project Paperclip. (Which may mean CIA mind control & etc is based on the bizarre Nazi “Vril” research programs — the consequences of this would unimaginable to most people, including me. “Vril” was NOT just a flying saucer theory thing.)

The chief architect of the program was one Dr. Greenbaum, who apparently worked on Mengele-style experiments in the camps. It’s likely that this name was a pseudonym and the actual doctor’s name was Dr. Luther Wilson Greene, who worked at Edgewood Arsenal in the 1950s and 1960s before his death in 1973.

Now, here’s the crazy part.

If you’ve been reading my messages you’re hopefully familiar with the general concept of hypnosis and personality-splitting under hypnosis. This was popularized by G. Hobben Estabrooks, who helped perfect the hypnotic technique for Allied intelligence in WWII, and then talked about it in his books. He called it “too true to be good” — perhaps he was aware of what Hammond would later disclose in his speech.

What Hammond discloses in his speech is not simple personality splitting. What Hammond discloses is INSTALLING A NEW OPERATING SYSTEM INTO PEOPLE’S MINDS. With kernel, libraries, drivers, and all!

This is a full “shadow” operating system, which operates concurrently with the main “personality.” Perhaps it should be considered a particularly sophisticated piece of malware. In architectural complexity and size, it certainly rivals Flame or #badBIOS.

Yes, there has been stuff posted to the Internet about this, under the guise of “Monarch” programming. I’d discarded it as too fantastic —
“Beta” sex slaves, psychic assassins, plenty of Cabbalistic mysticism and pseudo-Crowleyana, etc.

But… Hammond confirms it all! Even the MONARCH code name, which apparently represents the government side of the “program.” (Evidently, both the US government and private-sector groups are involved.)

Again, I should emphasize that Hammond went to considerable lengths to verify that these results were not “mirages.” He fed bits and pieces —
key words, code names — to other therapists he knew across the country. He had them ask their OWN patients under hypnosis, patients who showed symptoms of being victims of this.

Those therapists asked their hypnotized patients, “does this code name mean anything to you?” and reported the patients’ answers back to Hammond. In almost every case, the patients described having the same “programming architecture” in their heads as Hammond was finding in his own patients.

And what an architecture it was. The full details are too much to reproduce here — you’ll have to read the speech yourself. (The file should have long finished downloading by now.)

Reading Hammond’s description of the MONARCH architecture, I’m reminded to a certain degree of OpenSSL. Not only are there main programs, but there are backups and backups for the backups. There are Cabbalistic Trees and sub-personalities and watchdogs. (I’m surprised there’s no VAX support.)

And, just like OpenSSL, there’s a Heartbleed vulnerability. Because, under hypnosis, Hammond was able to read out great sections of the patients’ memory, including the architecture and “secret keys” to the MONARCH personality-programs.

One thing he did not quite succeed in was deprogramming them.

He got quite far. However, I get the impression his “disassemble the code step by step” approach is far too time consuming to succeed in a practical amount of time. Hammond admits at much in the Q&As.

In order for someone who’s been “programmed” like this to get well, they must:

1) thoroughly break contact with the cult or organization that did the programming, including preventing internal “programs” from taking over momentarily and PHONING HOME to let the cult know where the patients are and how to get in contact, and,

2) go through a LOT of therapy (at least, with Hammond’s way of working)

My instinct, reading through the Hammond speech, is that there must be a better way. Just based on instinct and intuition, there’s gotta be a way to un-fuck the brain, provided the patient is willing, that doesn’t require the full “OpenSSL Valhalla Rampage.”

One clue turned up when I was looking into the background of the speech. You see, my first instinct upon reading all this was, “well, it’s a transcript… the doctor’s for real, but how do I know some conspiracy theorist — or some conspiracy — didn’t make up the speech as disinformation?”

As it turns out, I found an interview [2] with another reputable doctor, who’s written some 170 peer-reviewed papers in the psychology and multiple personality field. This man was PHYSICALLY PRESENT for Hammond’s 1992 speech, and confirms that the generally circulated transcript is accurate.

What’s more, he explains the mechanism by which these “personalities” are formed during the “programming process.” (Where the “programming process” involves severe, horrifying, awful trauma and abuse.)

Summarizing from the interview [2], these separate personalities come about when the physical or emotional trauma becomes too overwhelming to cope with. At this point, the victim starts “imagining there’s someone else inside” who’s dealing with the horror instead.

As he puts it, “although that’s not literally true… it becomes very emotionally and psychologically true.” You don’t have to deal with the full brunt of the trauma because “someone else is dealing with it.”

To my eye… what’s going on here is the victim is creating a new psychological entity, and transferring responsibility for the situation to that entity. “here, you deal with it!”

I don’t know exactly how this would lead to a ‘cure,’ but it’s very interesting. I would also be curious what would happen if victims took the Nikola Tesla approach — simply rendering moot the influence of “subconscious structures” on their lives, by practicing rigorous self denial. (as described here a while back)

One last question, and then you can go read the speech. (It’s Easter, you’ve got time.)

Why are these people doing all this?

I mean, it’s a ton of effort. Even Satanists and spies have day jobs, after all.

Hammond theorizes it’s to create an army of tens of thousands of robots, in order to serve the needs of organized crime and let the “megalomaniacs at the top” create a “Satanic Order that will rule the world.”

Could be.

But, if it comes from Nazi stuff, I’ll bet the ultimate aim is the same as all fascism, whether Roman fasces or the more modern black and red varieties — creating a “global brain” network in order to, well, RULE THE WORLD! (cue maniacal laughter)

I will have to develop this hypnothesis more thoroughly in another message, as this one is getting long. However… and I’m aware I am not presenting quite enough evidence to link these ideas… it is interesting to note Assange’s seeming advocacy of the “global brain” concept at SXSW, in light of Assange’s previous contact with an Australian mind-control cult.

Doubly interesting, given an Australian man’s claim that he helped found Wikileaks — as a means of destroying the MONARCH mind control network which Hammond describes. [3]

[1] http://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=Document:Beyond_Dutroux_ties_to_1950s-era_CIA_covert_operations&oldid=20449#I_give_you…_.22Dr. _Green.22_aka_Luther_Wilson_Greene

[2] http://www.sott.net/article/261839-SOTT-Talk-Radio-Dr-Colin-Ross-Interview-CIA-Doctors-and-the-Psychiatry-Scam

[3] http://www.wikileaks-forum.com/accountability-progress/32/origin-of-the-idea-subsequently-named-wikileaks/15411/

%d bloggers like this: